в сухом остатке два варианта:
Anyone has a quick and easy fix, please ?
The --absolute-names option should work around any problem here.
However, this also disables some important security checking, so don't
use it unless you trust the source of the tar image.
Possibly umsdos is not reporting st_dev and st_ino correctly to tar,> The only "strange" thing in the setup I am doing this
> is that I am extracting from an iso9660 image file mounted using the loop
> option to a umsdos FAT32 filesystem. Who knows, maybe tar does not like
> UMSDOS, but IMHO it should be transparent to it what kind of filesystem
> it's reading/writing from/to.
when tar issues the 'stat' system call on an umsdos directory. That
would explain the problem. (It would also suggest that you have
a serious problem with umsdos, but that's a different matter.)
You can test this theory (and the other theories mentioned above) by
running strace on tar, and looking at what the stat calls are
не совсем понятно что про umsdos они имели ввиду.
у меня ext4.